Bizas, Konstantions (2016), “Reinhart Koselleck’s Work on Crisis”, French Journal for Media Research, no. 5.

Blumenberg, Hans (1999), The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, Robert M. Wallace (trans.), The MIT Press.

Edmonds-Copey (2016), “How Convincing is Reinhart Koselleck’s Concept of Sattelzeit (1750-1850)?”, The Theory and Practice of Intellectual History (IH5003).

Edwards, Jason (2006), “Critique in Crisis Today: Koselleck, Enlightenment and the Concept of Politics”, Contemporary Political Theory, no. 5.

Fillafer, Franz Leander (2007), “The Enlightenment on Trial, Reinhart Koselleck’s Interpretation of Aufklärung”, in: The Many Faces of Clio, Q. Edward Wang and Franz L. Fillafer (eds.), NewYork, Oxford: Berghahn Books.

Gilbert, Andrew Simon (2019), The Crisis Paradigm, Description and Prescription in Social and Political Theory, Plagravemacmillan

Kant, Immanuel (1784), “Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?”, Text Gemeinfrei, Aufmachung Urheberrechtlich Geschützt.

Koselleck, Reinhart (1997), “The Temporalization of Concepts”, in: Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, vol. 1, SoPhi

Koselleck, Reinhart (1988), Critique and Crisis, Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society, The MIT Press.

Norberg, Jakob (2015), “Concepts, Political”, The Encyclopedia of Political Though, Michael Gibbons (ed.), Wiley-Blackwell.

Olsen, Niklas (2014), History in the Ploral, an Introduction to the Work of Reinhart Koselleck, Berghahn Books.

Pankakoski, Timo (2010), “Conflict, Context, Concreteness: Koselleck and Schmitt on Concepts”, Political Theory, vol. 38, no. 6.

Sternhell, Zeev (2010), The Anti-Enlightenment Tradition, David Maisel (trans.), Yale University.

Tribe, Keit (Translator’s Introduction in: Reinhart Koselleck) (2004), Futurs Past, on the Semantics of Historical Time, Translated and with an Introduction by Keith Tribe, Columbia: Columbia University Press.